Endy, co-founder of the BioBricks Foundation (BBF), came to Berlin with the hope that "the conferees of 24C3 will help me to understand how to best enable an overwhelmingly constructive hacker culture for programming DNA". Endy campaigns for a more open culture of biological technology, where biological engineering would not have to be confined to the laboratories of high-end industry laboratories.
Using BioBrick™ standard biological parts, a synthetic biologist or biological engineer can already, to some extent, program living organisms in the same way a computer scientist can program a computer. The DNA sequence information and other characteristics of BioBrick™ standard biological parts are made available to the public free of charge currently via MIT's Registry of Standard Biological Parts.
Another video features Drew Endy discussing BioBrick standard biological parts and in this podcast he talks about open source biology.
Oh! And don't miss the comic he worked on together with Isadora Deese & The MIT Synthetic Biology Working Group: Adventures in Synthetic Biology.
Yeah! Another year has passed (Best wishes to all of you, dear readers!), another Chaos Communication Congress has just ended in Berlin.
You'll find of course loads of pictures, some videos of the talks on google videos, you tube, while official conference recordings will be online soon.
One of the talks i attended was Rose White's. The history of guerilla knitting looked at the overlapping issues in the knitting and hacking worlds. The video is yours to download. Here's a few words and links to complete the picture.
But knitting is not difficult so people discovered how to do it and knowledge spread in the community. Knitting then followed two different paths: the industrial production the home made kind, mainly socks and small pieces of clothing.
Late 19th century, Gansy.
Over the course of the next 50 years, attempts to codify knitting patterns, to make them distinguishable and proprietary. The yarn and needles sellers would provide you with a specific type of information: "To make this jumper you will need x balls of our yarns and will have to use this size of our needles." You would not know how many meters of yarn this makes for example. Industry possessed the means and modes of production by the '60s.
Another schism happened at the end of the '60s and beginning '70s. Then enters our heroine: Elizabeth Zimmermann. She was commissioned to make a sweater. She gave it to the company but they re-wrote the patterns using a proprietary system. Disgusted by the process, she started her own company and she'd invite knitters to be the boos of their knitting, distinguishing the "blind followers" from the "thinking knitters." The point was to put the control of what was going on back into the hands of the knitter. It's like Linux versus Windows.
In the 1960s and 1970s, Barbara Walker authored knitting books which have become landmarks for their comprehensiveness and clarity. She devised knitting instructions which were understandable to all, not just to english speakers.
Norah Gaughan, a biologist who uses scientific notions in her knitting.
Radical Lace & Subversive Knitting at the Museum of Arts & Design, in Manhattan (more images). The MAD used to be called "The American Craft Museum" until it was re-named less than 5 years ago. Now of course craft is starting the get back it technique and skills undertones.
Dave Cole's "Knitting Machine? project used two excavators wielding telephone poles as needles to knit a giant American flag in the courtyard of the Massachusetts Museum of Contemporary Art.
A Tree Undone, the artist brought a tree to Burning Man, wrote a pattern explaining how leaves should be knitted, and together with the citizens of Black Rock City knitted thousands of leaves. They were not bound off so each leaf could unravel in the wind.
People knitting red mittens for the statue of Lenin in Seattle. Other knitters, this time in New York making boots and scarves for statues of horsemen.
A last one for the road: